McCarthy's Punctuation Rules
After I read McCarthy’s punctuation rules, I understood the
points he was making, but I did not fully agree with them. McCarthy says that punctuation is not
necessary in many cases and it only fills up the page with excess marks. While some punctuation is excessive, I think
it is important to include punctuation where it is necessary. This makes sentences grammatically correct,
but it also helps the paper flow. McCarthy says he uses commas, but not very
often. This is the first point that I
disagree with. Commas are important for
a writer to let the reader know when to pause in the text. Without them, sentences would be long,
monotone, and most likely confusing. Another example
would be commas in lists. If they are not included, the separate words
could not be differentiated from one another.
McCarthy also says that he does not use quotation marks because it is
the writer’s job to make the text clear enough so that he or she doesn’t need
to include them. I disagree with this
point because quotation marks provide clarity for the reader, and the writer
still needs to provide who is speaking and the context of the quote even when
using quotations. McCarthy also states, “No
semicolons.” Colons are allowed in very
few cases, but as a matter of fact I find myself using semicolons not very
often. I do agree with McCarthy on that
point. Overall, McCarthy says this simplistic
writing style helps the reader and makes it easier for him or her, but I believe
this only confuses the reader because it is hard to stray from conventional
grammar rules after so many years of use.
It would take an excellent writer to make up for the lack of punctuation
through detail and clear explanations.
Comments
Post a Comment